Effective language teaching methods in online learning environments: A case study of Virtual University of Pakistan

Authors

  • Dr. Ayesha Perveen Assistant Professor, Department of English, Virtual University of Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Asif Lecturer, Department of English, Virtual University of Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.04.03.346

Keywords:

Language Teaching Methods, Online Learning, Virtual University of Pakistan, Communicative Language Teaching, Learner Autonomy

Abstract

The higher education landscape is continually evolving by imbibing technology and artificial intelligence for facilitating students’ needs, expectations and aspirations. While many institutions are adopting online frameworks for higher education, the online universities constantly need to reevaluate their systems to best facilitate students. One such re-evaluation is a need for language teaching programs offered by online universities. In this regard, this study aimed to explore students’ perceptions about the best language teaching method in online settings. For this purpose, that data was collected from the students enrolled in Virtual University of Pakistan’s BS English course Language Teaching Methods offered by the Department of English. The study included all students enrolled in the course. Qualitative data gathered through the Graded Discussion Board (GDB) i.e., 1190 posts were screened, coded and five themes were finalized. The findings of the study revealed that students preferred the communicative language teaching method. Moreover, they suggested its implementation at the university through collaboration projects, technological adaptation of latest applications and software and learner autonomy through a combination of both a/synchronous activities for improving their language skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

As’ari, M. D., & Budiman, R. A. Rizky Muhammad Nur Alam, Sisy Aliviya. (2021). The implementation of grammar translation method (gtm) in the digital learning of reading comprehension. ICONNECTS 2021, 350. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Librilianti- KurniaYuki/publication/353514447_PUBLIKASI_PROCEEDING_iCONNECT2021 _rev_27_Feb_21_1/links/610125172bf3553b29175dd5/PUBLIKASI- PROCEEDING-iCONNECT2021-rev-27-Feb-21-1.pdf#page=361

Ausubel, D. P. (1980). Psicologia educacional. 2. ed. New York: Interamericana.

Barona-Oñate, R.V., López-Pérez, S.d.l.A., López López, J.P., Mocha-Bonilla, J.A. (2020). Use of E-Learning and Audio-Lingual Method for the Development of Listening Comprehension Skills. In: Nummenmaa, J., Pérez-González, F., Domenech-Lega, B., Vaunat, J., Oscar Fernández-Peña, F. (eds) Advances and Applications in Computer Science, Electronics and Industrial Engineering. CSEI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1078. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33614- 1-6

Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Q. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carvalho, J. A M. (1995). The use of feature films in EFL classes in Brazil. Bauru: Edusc.

Dorn, M. (2021). The Silent Way-speaking volumes. Bringing the latest research to your classroom modern English teacher, 30 (2). https://scholar.xjtlu.edu.cn/ws/portalfiles/portal/47711546/MET_30.2_April_2021.pdf

Healey, D. (2016). Language learning and technology: Past, present and future. In The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. Routledge.

Hieu, N. T. M., Giang, N. T., Tuyen, T., Loc, N., & Ha, N. D. N. (2022). The implementation of communicative language teaching in the context of online learning: a literature review. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i3.4251

Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.

Kern, R. (2024). Twenty-first century technologies and language education: Charting a path forward. Modern language Journal, 108, 515-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12924

Lado, R. (1964). Language Teaching. A scientific approach. United States: McGraw-Hill.

Miles, M., and Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 2nd Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook 3rd Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Otto, S. E. (2017). From past to present: A hundred years of technology for L2 learning. The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning. Wiley.

Psoinos, D. I. (2021). Adapting Approaches and Methods to Teaching English Online: Theory and Practice. Springer Nature.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.

Sumardı, S., & Nugrahanı, D. (2021). Adaptation to emergency remote teaching: Pedagogical strategy for pre-service language teachers amid COVID-19 pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906553

Stack, E. M. (1966). The language laboratory and Modern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Taridi, M., Risnita, Yaakob, M. F. M., & Khairani, M. (2024). An evaluative study for communicative language teaching (CLT) on online teaching and learning in higher education: Indonesian and Malaysian university context. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 10611-10647.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12221-6

Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-14

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories