Debt, fertilizer mafias, and rising input costs: Structural barriers to farmer well-being in Punjab, Pakistan

Authors

  • Humaira Raheem M.Phil Scholar, Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of Sargodha, Punjab-Pakistan Author
  • Kaleem Ullah Lecturer, Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of Sargodha, Punjab-Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Zainul Abidin Lecturer, Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of Sargodha, Punjab-Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Zarqa Azhar Lecturer, Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of Sargodha, Punjab-Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.04.03.341

Keywords:

Debt, Fertilizer Mafias, Input Costs, Smallholder Farmers, Structural Vulnerability, Pakistan

Abstract

This study examines how debt dependency, fertilizer cartels, and rising input costs affect farmer well-being in Punjab, the country’s primary food-producing region. A structured survey of 106 smallholder farmers, supported by descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and illustrative farmer narratives, reveals the depth of these constraints. Results show that nearly 69% of farmers strongly agreed that debt cycles reduce their household income, while 70% identified fertilizer mafias as a major source of exploitation. Rising seed prices (78%), diesel costs (56%), and labor expenses (41%) were further reported as significant burdens. Coping strategies such as borrowing from informal lenders (58%), reducing input use (46%), and reliance on non-farm wage labor (42%) highlight reactive rather than transformative responses, often reinforcing vulnerability. The findings underscore a poverty–vulnerability trap in which structural dependency and market capture prevent resilience-building and accelerate youth disengagement from agriculture. Policy implications include stronger regulation of fertilizer and seed markets, improved access to affordable credit and insurance, cooperative models for input and output markets, and measures to offset rising energy costs. Addressing these barriers is essential to safeguard smallholder livelihoods and Pakistan’s broader food security. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abid, M., Scheffran, J., Schneider, U. A., & Elahi, E. (2019). Farmer perceptions of climate change, observed trends and adaptation of agriculture in Pakistan. Environmental management, 63(1), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0623-4

Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006

Ali, A., & Erenstein, O. (2017). Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security in Pakistan. Climate Risk Management, 16, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2016.12.001

Birthal, P. S., Negi, D. S., Jha, A. K., & Singh, D. (2014). Income sources of farm households in India: Determinants, distributional consequences and policy implications. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 27(1), 37-48.

Carleton, T. A. (2017). Crop-damaging temperatures increase suicide rates in India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(33), 8746–8751. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701354114

Chandio, A. A., & Jiang, Y. (2018). Determinants of credit constraints: Evidence from Sindh, Pakistan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(15), 3401-3410. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1481743

Dercon, S. (2004). Insurance against poverty. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, F. (1998). Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422553

FAO. (2021). The state of food and agriculture: Making agrifood systems more resilient to shocks and stresses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Government of Pakistan. (2023). Pakistan economic survey 2022–23. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.

Hameed, W. U., & Qaiser, F. (2019). Youth migration: Changing aspirations in rural Punjab. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.010

Haggblade, S., Hazell, P. B. R., & Reardon, T. (2010). The rural non-farm economy: Prospects for growth and poverty reduction. World Development, 38(10), 1429–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.008

Hossain, N. (2024, June 26). Rising production costs and falling returns strain Pakistani farmers. Khaama Press. Retrieved from: https://www.khaama.com/rising-production-costs-and-falling-returns-strain-pakistani-farmers/

Ullah, S., Abid, A., Aslam, W., Noor, R. S., Waqas, M. M., & Gang, T. (2021). Predicting behavioral intention of rural inhabitants toward economic incentive for deforestation in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(2), 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020617

Nadeem, F., Jacobs, B., & Cordell, D. (2024). Adapting to climate change in vulnerable areas: Farmers’ perceptions in Punjab, Pakistan. Climate, 12(5), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12050058

Reardon, T. (1997). Using evidence of household income diversification to inform study of the rural nonfarm labor market in Africa. World Development, 25(5), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00137-4

Ribot, J. (2017). Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. In New Directions in Agrarian Political Economy (pp. 27-66). Routledge.

Scoones, I. (2013). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. In Critical perspectives in rural development studies (pp. 159-184). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820503

World Bank. (2023). Climate change knowledge portal: Pakistan. The World Bank Group. https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/pakistan.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-12

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories