Denying the heat: Climate change skepticism on the American far-right
Keywords:
Environmentalism, Climate denial machinery, Skepticism, Far-right, Climate change, United StatesAbstract
This research adopts secondary research with an exploratory design, suitable for examining the complex and multifaceted nature of climate change skepticism within the American far-right. The study is structured around three key dimensions. Historical Analysis: Archival research and secondary data sources (e.g., speeches, policy documents, media articles, and think tank publications from the 1960s onward) are used to trace the evolution of anti-environmentalism and its institutionalization within conservative politics. Ideological Discourse Analysis: The research employs discourse analysis to examine the narratives promoted by far-right political figures, conservative think tanks, and biased media outlets, particularly those shaping public attitudes toward climate change. Elite Interviews that are available on Pakistani social media YouTube access including policymakers, environmental activists, former think tank affiliates, and climate journalists, to gain insider perspectives on the mechanisms and motivations behind climate skepticism. The author of this paper analyzed data using thematic analysis. Themes are developed inductively, identifying recurring patterns and divergences across ideological, economic, and media-related dimensions. Insights are integrated with findings from the literature and discourse analysis to develop a holistic understanding of the climate change skepticism on the American right phenomenon.
Downloads
References
Bastug, M. F. (2021a). Cyber evolution of terrorist groups. Orion Policy Institute. https://orionpolicy.org/orionforum/58/cyber-evolution-of-terrorist-groups
Agrawala, S., & Van Aalst, M. (2008). Adapting development cooperation to adapt to climate change. Climate Policy, 8(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0435
Carson, R. (2002). Silent Spring. Mariner Books (Houghton Mifflin). (Original work published 1962)
Cockett, R. (1995). Thinking the Unthinkable. HarperCollins Publishers.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (1968). The Population Bomb. Buccaneer.
Forchtner, B. (2019). The Far Right and the Environment: Politics, discourse and communication. Routledge.
Georgeson, L., Maslin, M., Poessinouw, M., & Howard, S. (2016). Adaptation responses to climate change differ between global megacities. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 584-588. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2944
Gerrard, M., & Dernbach, J. (2019). Legal Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in The United States. Enviornmental Law Institute.
Lahsen, M. (2008). Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist “trio” supporting the backlash against global warming. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.10.001
Milne, C. (2006). Green Politics. The Companion of Tasmanian History. https://www.utas.edu.au/library/companion_to_tasmanian_history/G/Green%20Politics.htm
Oreskes, N. (2004). The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science, 306(5702), 1686-1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Saqib Khan Warraich, Abeera Haider (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.